Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Arseny Sher
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion
Date
Msg-id 87d1d9xmyf.fsf@ispras.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion  (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> While I admire your fearlessness, I think the chances of you being
> able to bring a project of this type to a successful conclusion are
> remote.  Here is what I said about this topic previously:
>
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa=kzHJ+TwxyQ+vKu21nk3prkRjSdbhjubN7qvc8UKuGg@mail.gmail.com

Well, as I said, I don't pretend that I will support full functionality:
>> instead, we should decide which part of this work (if any) is
>> going to be done in the course of GSoC. Probably, all TPC-H queries
>> with and without index support is a good initial target, but this
>> needs to be discussed.

I think that successfull completion of this project should be a clear
and justified answer to the question "Is this idea is good enough to
work on merging it into the master?", not the production-ready patches
themselves. Nevertheless, of course project success criterion must be
reasonably formalized -- e.g. implement nodes X with features Y, etc.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL orother PL functions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size