Re: fstat vs. lseek - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoamXb9XLcGZvf=cG61+xbNhmDjzDmn4fq=u580A2hbUfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fstat vs. lseek  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: fstat vs. lseek
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> The lseek patches just got included in Linus tree.

Excellent, thanks for the update!

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=ef3d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60

So I guess this will be in Linux 3.2?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified