Re: fstat vs. lseek - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date
Msg-id 201110282222.01614.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fstat vs. lseek  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Friday, October 28, 2011 09:40:51 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > The lseek patches just got included in Linus tree.
> 
> Excellent, thanks for the update!
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=ef3
> d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60
> 
> So I guess this will be in Linux 3.2?
Unless they get reverted for some reason, yes.


Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?