Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoaj5eAG4KeTQJNfX1=v=5WQcH7Gqvav7Tb1OpGU_EVqCA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:06 AM Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think that this patch is basically correct, except that it's not
>> correct to set mqh_counterparty_attached when receiver is still NULL.
>> Here's a v2 where I've attempted to correct that while preserving the
>> essence of your proposed fix.
>
> This looks good to me,

Thanks for checking. Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson