Re: dsm_unpin_segment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: dsm_unpin_segment
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaWXYJ9e9NqgMUVzdOERJnWuS92apuR56VjUhxbXhr+Dw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dsm_unpin_segment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> + int control_slot = -1;
>>> ...
>>> + if (control_slot == -1)
>>> + elog(ERROR, "cannot unpin unknown segment handle");
>>>
>>> Isn't it better to use INVALID_CONTROL_SLOT for control_slot and use
>>> datatype as uint32 (same is used for dsm_segment->control_slot and
>>> nitems)?
>>
>> Yes, it is better.  New version attached.
>>
>
> This version of patch looks good to me.  I have marked it as Ready For
> Committer.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling