Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaWLT0vO3iHpXGMt=Orv=P8eZk6T7WLPq6UVMukcSBxJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:43 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about have an API to get the single file or list of files? We will use a single file in
> our application and other tools can get the benefit of list of files.

That sounds a bit speculative to me. Who is to say that anyone will
find that useful? I mean, I think it's fine and good to build the
functionality that we need in a way that maximizes the likelihood that
other tools can reuse that functionality, and I think we should do
that. But I don't think it's smart to build functionality that we
don't really need in the hope that somebody else will find it useful
unless we're pretty sure that they actually will. I don't see that as
being the case here; YMMV.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and encrypted files
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?