Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaW6JYWrjZ7pVz9Tni=uWUVXK-M0g+LorOV3tGAZcQbQQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason
>> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event.
>> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that
>> is easily fixed.)  Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not
>> want to see it go away?
>
> Please remove.

+1!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: mosbench revisited