Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKbPJ-Jk6t7DCT8r4meTTLaGCuxuEwiq5tg7ip_oNpoZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> AFAICS we could get rid of WalSndDelay: there is no longer any reason
> for the walsender loop to wake up unless it's received a latch event.
> (Its WaitLatch call is missing WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH right now, but that
> is easily fixed.)  Is anyone sufficiently attached to that GUC to not
> want to see it go away?

Please remove.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: wal_sender_delay (WalSndDelay) has served its purpose
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: mosbench revisited