Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaVPgO8VvAm-6CzOmMHmXUWL19hD6u9qBnBftXz4oFzAQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: scan key push down to heap [WIP]
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> By the way, I'm a bit skeptical whether this enhancement is really beneficial
> than works for this enhancement, because we can now easily increase the number
> of processor cores to run seq-scan with qualifier, especially, when it has high
> selectivity.
> How about your thought?

Are you saying we don't need to both making sequential scans faster
because we could just use parallel sequential scan instead?  That
doesn't sound right to me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: who calls InitializeTimeouts() ?