Re: Built-in connection pooling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Built-in connection pooling
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaTGucLEW+tSfFRcTt59J0R0FtNhnwYHeG0pnuBx3WNgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> What _I_ (maybe not others) want is a
> faster pgbouncer that is integrated into the database; IMO it does
> everything exactly right.

I have to admit that I find that an amazing statement.  Not that
pgbouncer is bad technology, but saying that it does everything
exactly right seems like a vast overstatement.  That's like saying
that you don't want running water in your house, just a faster motor
for the bucket you use to draw water from the well.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FPW stats?
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: lazy detoasting