Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaHDiznESbH1+JAZbezeHwu7EbKFcKKqsOj67-em7AVSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer  (Takashi Menjo <takashi.menjou.vg@hco.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses RE: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer  (Takashi Menjo <takashi.menjou.vg@hco.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:28 AM Takashi Menjo
<takashi.menjou.vg@hco.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I think our concerns are roughly classified into two:
>
>  (1) Performance
>  (2) Consistency
>
> And your "different concern" is rather into (2), I think.

Actually, I think it was mostly a performance concern (writes
triggering lots of reading) but there might be a consistency issue as
well.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: Making psql error out on output failures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: VALUES ROW(...)