On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That does seem to give better results, but it still seems awfully
>> complicated. If we just used Levenshtein with all-default cost
>> factors and a distance cap equal to Max(strlen(what_user_typed),
>> strlen(candidate_match), 3), what cases that you think are important
>> would be harmed?
>
> Well, just by plugging in default Levenshtein cost factors, I can see
> the following regression:
>
> *** /home/pg/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/join.out 2014-11-20
> 10:17:55.042291912 -0800
> --- /home/pg/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/join.out 2014-11-20
> 11:42:15.670108745 -0800
> ***************
> *** 3452,3458 ****
> ERROR: column atts.relid does not exist
> LINE 1: select atts.relid::regclass, s.* from pg_stats s join
> ^
> - HINT: Perhaps you meant to reference the column "atts"."indexrelid".
>
> Within the catalogs, the names of attributes are prefixed as a form of
> what you might call internal namespacing. For example, pg_index has
> attributes that all begin with "ind*". You could easily omit something
> like that, while still more or less knowing what you're looking for.
>
> In more concrete terms, this gets no suggestion:
>
> postgres=# select key from pg_index;
> ERROR: 42703: column "key" does not exist
> LINE 1: select key from pg_index;
> ^
>
> Only this does:
>
> postgres=# select ikey from pg_index;
> ERROR: 42703: column "ikey" does not exist
> LINE 1: select ikey from pg_index;
> ^
> HINT: Perhaps you meant to reference the column "pg_index"."indkey".
> postgres=#
Seems fine to me. If you typed relid rather than indexrelid or key
rather than indkey, that's a thinko, not a typo. ikey for indkey
could plausible be a typo, though you'd have to be having a fairly bad
day at the keyboard.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
