On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> Anyway, I suggest to keep that for another round and keep the Robert's
> isofunctional patch as it is before extending.
+1. Let's please get the basic thing committed, and then people can
write more patches to extend and improve it. There is no reason to
squash-merge every enhancement someone might want here into what I
wrote.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
