> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>> Anyway, I suggest to keep that for another round and keep the Robert's
>> isofunctional patch as it is before extending.
>
> +1. Let's please get the basic thing committed, and then people can
> write more patches to extend and improve it. There is no reason to
> squash-merge every enhancement someone might want here into what I
> wrote.
From my point of view the latest v6 of the patch is pretty "ready for
committers", but I'm not sure whom should decide that...
Should I just update the state in the commitfest interface?
--
Fabien.
