Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa7VxEQyCNVtB5c8FmVhqYWkqQ=swAY6Dyn0Yb-Nfefvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block  (Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 2:53 AM Anthonin Bonnefoy
<anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:26 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > I don't mind being more careful here based on your concerns, so I'll
> > go remove that in the stable branches.
>
> Sorry about that. I didn't have a strong need for this to be
> backpatched and should have made this clearer.

FWIW, I don't think you did anything wrong. To me, the thread reads
like you just submitted this as a normal patch and Michael decided to
back-patch.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Consider the number of columns in the sort cost model
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum