Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anthonin Bonnefoy
Subject Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date
Msg-id CAO6_XqqsmS2m6vaid3ZXjJ8H8UHsCo2a1f7rpea_wLdcn91raw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:26 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I don't mind being more careful here based on your concerns, so I'll
> go remove that in the stable branches.

Sorry about that. I didn't have a strong need for this to be
backpatched and should have made this clearer.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove useless casts to (void *)
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation