On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So the alternatives I see are to revert what bf7ca1587 tried to do
> here, or to try to make it work that way across-the-board, which
> implies (a) a very much larger amount of work, and (b) breaking
> important behaviors that are decades older than that commit.
> It's not even entirely clear that we could get to complete
> consistency if we went down that path.
Continuing my tour through the "bug fixes" section of the CommitFest,
I came upon this thread. Unfortunately there's not that much I can do
to progress it, because I've already expressed all the opinions that I
have on this thread. If we back-patch Tom's originally proposed fix, i
expect we might get a complaint or too, but the current behavior of
being able to create unreadable tables is indisputably poor, and I'm
not in a position to tell Tom that he has to go write a different fix
instead, or even that such a fix is possible. Unless somebody else
wants to comment, which IMHO would be good, I think it's up to Tom to
make a decision here on how he'd like to proceed and then, probably,
just do it.
Anyone else have thoughts?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
