Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZp0UGGrka5LAFHp_LzUAHsEh+Q5v6v4BcVXMPRFG-S9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Just noticed that RangeVarCallbackForRenameRule() was not updated to
> handle partitioned tables, causing the following bug:
>
> create table parted_table (a int) partition by list (a);
> create table part partition of parted_table for values in (1);
> create rule parted_table_insert as on insert to parted_table
>   do instead insert into part values (new.*);
> alter rule parted_table_insert on parted_table
>   rename to parted_table_insert_redirect;
> -- ERROR:  "parted_table" is not a table or view
>
> Attached fixes this and adds a test.  Added to open items list.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FDW and parallel execution
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)