Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id 0c498511-a412-61ed-e5f3-abd0035f7bb0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RENAME RULE doesn't work with partitioned tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/04/12 2:20, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Just noticed that RangeVarCallbackForRenameRule() was not updated to
>> handle partitioned tables, causing the following bug:
>>
>> create table parted_table (a int) partition by list (a);
>> create table part partition of parted_table for values in (1);
>> create rule parted_table_insert as on insert to parted_table
>>   do instead insert into part values (new.*);
>> alter rule parted_table_insert on parted_table
>>   rename to parted_table_insert_redirect;
>> -- ERROR:  "parted_table" is not a table or view
>>
>> Attached fixes this and adds a test.  Added to open items list.
> 
> Committed.

Thanks.

Regards,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dropping a partition may cause deadlock
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation