On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> I've been considering similar things, as you can find in the archives,
> but what I was thinking of was converting the number to just a plain
> bigint, then letting the user apply whatever arithmetic wanted at the
> SQL level. I never got around to acutally coding it, though. It could
> easily be extracted from your patch of course - and I think that's a
> more flexible approach. Is there some advantage to your method that
> I'm missing?
I went so far as to put together an lsn data type. I didn't actually
get all that far with it, which is why I haven't posted it sooner, but
here's what I came up with. It's missing indexing support and stuff,
but that could be added if people like the approach. It solves this
problem by implementing -(lsn,lsn) => numeric (not int8, that can
overflow since it is not unsigned), which allows an lsn => numeric
conversion by just subtracting '0/0'::lsn.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
