Re: abort-time portal cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: abort-time portal cleanup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZOWt2t5+WV-0ggCc+oisqXy49+MVAYv8WHJZtbpcp=Jg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: abort-time portal cleanup  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:34 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:13 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> /*
> * Otherwise, do nothing to cursors held over from a previous
> * transaction.
> */
> if (portal->createSubid == InvalidSubTransactionId)
> continue;
>
> /*
> * Do nothing to auto-held cursors.  This is similar to the case of a
> * cursor from a previous transaction, but it could also be that the
> * cursor was auto-held in this transaction, so it wants to live on.
> */
> if (portal->autoHeld)
> continue;
>
> I have one doubt that why do we need the second check. Because before
> setting portal->autoHeld to true we always call HoldPortal therein we
> set portal->createSubid to InvalidSubTransactionId.  So it seems to me
> that the second condition will never reach.  Am I missing something?

Not that I can see, but I don't necessarily think this patch needs to
change it, either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: abort-time portal cleanup
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and encrypted files