Re: remove wal_level archive - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: remove wal_level archive
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZL0mJuWrV-1PJ6M+SEmqEa0X-283CKerTERhaSkZKVnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove wal_level archive  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> We need to keep both, IMO, with 'archive' as an obsolete synonym for
> hot_standby.
>
> Otherwise pg_upgrade will get grumpy, and so will users who migrate
> their configurations.

Removing options entirely arguably brings some worthwhile
simplification from a user perspective, but it's really unclear to me
that mapping the same set of options onto fewer underlying behaviors
buys us much.  If we don't care enough about getting rid of archive to
force people to change postgresql.conf, I doubt whether this is buying
us enough to be worthwhile.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink