Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZKh8Ab-V5a7i0wPK8DyOEUX8RpKfG9y2YYW86mO943Rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 7:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> [pile^2]  Also, what is the rationale for locking the target buffer
> but not the source buffer?  That seems pretty hard to justify from
> here, even granting the assumption that we don't expect any other
> processes to be interested in these buffers (which I don't grant,
> because checkpointer).

Ooph. I agree.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication