Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 3681339.1659654673@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> And while I'm piling on, how is this bit in RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer
> not completely broken?

[pile^2]  Also, what is the rationale for locking the target buffer
but not the source buffer?  That seems pretty hard to justify from
here, even granting the assumption that we don't expect any other
processes to be interested in these buffers (which I don't grant,
because checkpointer).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints