Re: parallelizing the archiver - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: parallelizing the archiver
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZFq3bUxvpBYHKwii48-Ag4=bYMeCQbg1NXefESaurZew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallelizing the archiver  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: parallelizing the archiver
Re: parallelizing the archiver
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> Alright, here is an attempt at that.  With this revision, archive
> libraries are preloaded (and _PG_init() is called), and the archiver
> is responsible for calling _PG_archive_module_init() to get the
> callbacks.  I've also removed the GUC check hooks as previously
> discussed.

I would need to spend more time on this to have a detailed opinion on
all of it, but I agree that part looks better this way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions