On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 28 14:46:30 -0300 2012:
>> I keep hoping someone who knows Windows is going to take a look at
>> this, but so far no luck. It could also really use some attention
>> from someone who has an actual really big database handy, to see how
>> successful it is in reducing the dump time. Without those things, I
>> can't see this getting committed. But in the meantime, a few fairly
>> minor comments based on reading the code.
>
> My main comment about the current patch is that it looks like it's
> touching pg_restore parallel code by moving some stuff into parallel.c.
> If that's really the case and its voluminous, maybe this patch would
> shrink a bit if we could do the code moving in a first patch. That
> would be mostly mechanical. Then the interesting stuff would apply on
> top of that. That would make review easier.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
