Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZCf5HTqtZKvv__+190DKAyObZPdTc6ym=FvLetXEzmUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Err, actually, now that I think about it, that might be a problem:
>> what happens if we're trying to test two characters for equality and
>> the encoding conversion fails?
>
> This is surely all entirely doable given the encoding infrastructure
> we already have.  We might need some minor refactoring, eg to have
> a way of not throwing an error, but it's not going to be that hard
> to achieve if somebody wants to do it.  So I still see little reason
> for making the JSON type behave visibly differently in non-UTF8 database
> encodings.

OK.  It feels a little grotty to me, but I'll go with the flow.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpoint sync pause
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remembering bug #6123