Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 1559.1327087276@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Err, actually, now that I think about it, that might be a problem:
> what happens if we're trying to test two characters for equality and
> the encoding conversion fails?

This is surely all entirely doable given the encoding infrastructure
we already have.  We might need some minor refactoring, eg to have
a way of not throwing an error, but it's not going to be that hard
to achieve if somebody wants to do it.  So I still see little reason
for making the JSON type behave visibly differently in non-UTF8 database
encodings.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Inline Extension
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers