On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I dunno, it just looks odd to me that when we've set up a test case in
> which every one of the transactions is guaranteed to exceed the latency
> limit, that it doesn't say that they all did. I don't particularly buy
> your assumption that the percentages should sum. Anybody else have an
> opinion there?
I agree with you, but I don't think either approach is free from
possible confusion. I think it would help to show the numerator and
the denominator explicitly, e.g.:
number of clients: 1
number of threads: 1
number of transactions per client: 100
number of transactions actually processed: 33/100
number of transactions skipped: 67 (67.000 %)
number of transactions above the 1.0 ms latency limit: 33 (33 of 33, 100.000 %)
(My proposed change is in the last line.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
