Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ1P5XxBvk1sU9s5hpHXAZf8u5oHTP1+h_otx2kHaG9QQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:38 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2022-04-13 15:28:19 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:58:24PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > > I'm not still confident on this, but it should be better than the v1.
> >
> > +Andres as this seems to be related to 277692220.
>
> FWIW, that'd just mean it's an old bug that wasn't easily noticeable
> before, not that it's the fault of 277692220.

I think you're still on the hook to do something about it for this
release. You could decide to revert the commit adding the assertion
and punt on doing thing about the underlying bug, but we can't just be
like "oh, an assertion is failing, we'll get to that someday".

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks