On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
>> On 09/18/2015 01:07 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > Great. Robert, does that work for you, too? If so, this sub-thread is
>> > looking at three patches:
>> >
>> > 1. remove row_security=force
>> > 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to policies
>> > 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing
>> >
>> > They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) and
>> > (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those?
>>
>> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we
>> also need #3.
>
> Agreed on all of the above.
Well, then, we should get cracking. beta1 is coming soon, and it
would be best if this were done before then.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
