* Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 01:07 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Great. Robert, does that work for you, too? If so, this sub-thread is
> > looking at three patches:
> >
> > 1. remove row_security=force
> > 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to policies
> > 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing
> >
> > They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) and
> > (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those?
>
> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we
> also need #3.
Agreed on all of the above.
Thanks!
Stephen
