On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 15:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:42 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> >> Could ALTER TABLE use an option to drop the
>> >> primary key constraint? I needed to do that,
>> >> found it was not obvious, and this lead me to
>> >> try to improve things.
>> >
>> > That could be useful, I think. But it might open a can of worms.
>>
>> Would the new option be syntactic sugar around ALTER TABLE ... DROP
>> CONSTRAINT "put_the_name_of_the_primary_key_here"?
>
> Yes, I think so. We already have DROP NOT NULL, which is a similar case
> (except, of course, that it was born more out of necessity, because
> not-null constraints don't have a name, but that's being worked on).
Yeah. As usability issues go I think the lack of this syntax is a
fairly minor one, but I confess to having wanted to be able to type
ALTER TABLE foo DROP PRIMARY KEY more than once, so I wouldn't argue
if someone wanted to go make that happen.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
