On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:29 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the latest version I have fixed this issue by using a non
> conflicting name, because when it was compiled with-icu the foobar5
> was already used and we were seeing failure. Apart from this I have
> fixed the duplicate cleanup problem by passing an extra parameter to
> RelationCreateStorage, which decides whether to register for on-abort
> delete or not and added the comments for the same. IMHO this looks
> the most cleaner way to do it, please check the patch and let me know
> your thoughts.
I think that might be an OK way to do it. I think if we were starting
from scratch we'd probably want to come up with some better system,
but that's true of a lot of things.
I went over your version and changed some comments. I also added
documentation for the new wait event. Here's a new version.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
