On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't think you can make that conclusion. Perhaps the table once
> needed a toast table because of some wide column that got dropped;
> if so, it'd still have one. It'd be safer to look at
> pg_class.reltoastrelid to verify existence (or not) of the toast relation.
I believe that output was already shown earlier in the thread.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
