Hi,
On 2019-12-11 12:11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think you can make that conclusion. Perhaps the table once
> needed a toast table because of some wide column that got dropped;
> if so, it'd still have one. It'd be safer to look at
> pg_class.reltoastrelid to verify existence (or not) of the toast relation.
That was checked in the email I was responding to.
> It strikes me that there could easily be cases where a publisher table
> has a toast relation and a subscriber's doesn't ... maybe this code
> isn't expecting that?
This code is all running on the publisher side, so I don't think it
could matter.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
