Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYqXHp92rXFQE=+UUQ9doz=o0XSt9DB7YGGZ=MiLfbWtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we can do this even without using an additional infomask bit.
> As suggested by Greg up thread, we can set InvalidBlockId in ctid to
> indicate such an update.

Hmm.  How would that work?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increasing parallel workers at runtime