Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYkN9aBLNytrY8F+kn_4aGa4ePie4KF6_xNtF130+wYow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> David G. Johnston wrote:
>> Seems like if it stays the name is good - but at this point no has voiced
>> opposition to removing it and making the name a moot point.
>
> If we think the probability of bugs is 0%, then I'm all for removing it.
> I don't.  I vote to remove the GUC in a couple of releases, once it's
> proven completely useless.

No feature ever written has a 0% probability of bugs.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers