Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id 20180510175127.yfu5muayz3slflpp@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
David G. Johnston wrote:

> ​Seems like if it stays the name is good - but at this point no has voiced
> opposition to removing it and making the name a moot point.

If we think the probability of bugs is 0%, then I'm all for removing it.
I don't.  I vote to remove the GUC in a couple of releases, once it's
proven completely useless.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?