Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Date
Msg-id 20180510174057.lxvpwbgbbghz2zrm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2018-05-10 12:18:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Next question is what to do with this.  Do we want to sit on it till
> v12, or sneak it in now?

Is there a decent argument for sneaking it in? I don't really have an
opinion. I don't think it'd really be arguable that this'll make testing
meaningfully faster. OTOH, it's fresh in your mind (which can be said
about a lot of patches obviously).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?