Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYk2pk=ej4qinmwU9TQvA-gORm0rj7yse_-sTm37ExDLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> So is the latest patch posted upthread to process ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
> using locally-defined unique indexes on leaf partitions something to consider?

Yeah, for v11.

> Maybe, not until we have cascading index definition working [1]?

Not sure what that has to do with it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] JDBC 42.1.4 released
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c