Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYVzRTRYPXrHJGynjJfmbwi2mXbFoZ7Tc9KGuoi7=E0HA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> We need to add PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH as well, we don't support NULL
> for hash also, right?

I think it should.

Actually, I think that not supporting nulls for range partitioning may
have been a fairly bad decision.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security Documentation
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands