Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id 166a19ef-03ec-49c8-ff15-0026d6c952e7@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/05/12 10:42, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We need to add PARTITION_STRATEGY_HASH as well, we don't support NULL
>> for hash also, right?
> 
> I think it should.
> 
> Actually, I think that not supporting nulls for range partitioning may
> have been a fairly bad decision.

I think the relevant discussion concluded [1] that way, because we
couldn't decide which interface to provide for specifying where NULLs are
placed or because we decided to think about it later.

Thanks,
Amit

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZN_Zf7MBb48O66FAJgFe0S9_NkLVeQNBz6hsxb6Og93w%40mail.gmail.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands