Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYOd1UO6shiVaRhobSmBu_p1RB2+QUH8mMKFb867Uzwpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> If two backends both have an exclusive lock on the relation for a join
> operation, that implies that they need to do their own synchronization,
> because obviously the lock manager is not doing it for them.

This doesn't make sense to me.  Why would they need to synchronize
access to a relation in order to join it?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: francisk@hush.com
Date:
Subject: array exclusion constraints
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Another logical decoding assertion failure