Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYLv0btq6sGzROy5iu+6MwQ9gUh1_yaEp4jeTwBErhggQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
> back further?

I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: patch proposal
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs