Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYDzCSNmU_v3cUs-7yYL7h2=aP_cJrFN71bWM3R5QgTYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I tried implementing the second idea in the attached patch.  It fixes the
> bug (multiple reports as mentioned in the commit message) that tuples may
> be inserted into the wrong partition.

Looks good to me, thanks.  Committed with a few tweaks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code