Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYDta7SZQTKq6AXdQtM=eHrsLTbfX-T4P=wbV2TVu5fzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> [ updated patches ]
>
> I committed 0004 and also fixed the related regression test not to
> rely on DROP .. CASCADE, which isn't always stable.  The remainder of
> this patch set needs a rebase, and perhaps you could also fold in
> other pending partitioning fixes so I have everything to look at it in
> one place.

Just to be a little more clear, I don't mind multiple threads each
with a patch or patch set so much, but multiple patch sets on the same
thread gets hard for me to track.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait