Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobqMFXo0WDama89WOuPT5LTmXfTn6Ly=4rn_fMxZfgGUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> [ updated patches ]

I committed 0004 and also fixed the related regression test not to
rely on DROP .. CASCADE, which isn't always stable.  The remainder of
this patch set needs a rebase, and perhaps you could also fold in
other pending partitioning fixes so I have everything to look at it in
one place.

Thanks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling)