Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYCzTUWLnctQ0MtJ_QRoFBaf=GHnwWX2FcLsSG1kQKubw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is required to prohibit generating gather path for top rel in
> case of inheritence (Append node) at this place (we want to generate
> it later when scan/join target is available).

OK, but why don't we want to generate it later when there isn't
inheritance involved?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples