Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobyDksaVkoj=VTFovcw02mMBrjsbx7F9Nvm4tXTHU6HfQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> What I'm getting from the standard pgbench measurements, on both machines,
> is that this patch might be a couple percent slower than HEAD, but that is
> barely above the noise floor so I'm not too sure about it.

Hmm.  It seems like slowing down single client performance by a couple
of percent is something that we really don't want to do.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Next
From: Li Song
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] need info about extensibility in other databases